In a move that has ignited global criticism, the United States ceasefire has once again exercised its veto power at the UN Security Council, preventing the adoption of a resolution urging a ceasefire in Israel’s war in Gaza. This marks the third instance of the US blocking such a resolution, prompting reactions from countries and leaders worldwide.
**China Expresses Strong Disappointment:**
China’s UN envoy, Zhang Jun, didn’t mince words, expressing “strong disappointment and dissatisfaction” with the US decision. He emphasized the adverse message it sends, pushing Gaza into a more perilous situation. Zhang stressed the urgency of extinguishing the flames of war to prevent broader regional turmoil.
**Russia Accuses US of Playing for Time:**
Russia’s Ambassador to the UN, Vasily Nebenzia, painted the US veto as another dark chapter in the Security Council’s history. Nebenzia accused the US of buying time for Israel to pursue what he called “inhumane plans” for Gaza, indicating a deep concern about the unfolding situation.
Keep Reading…
PATIENTS AT GAZA’S NASSER HOSPITAL RAISE CONCERNS FOR WHO
GAZA’S NASSER HOSPITAL DECLARED NON-OPERATIONAL BY WHO FOLLOWING ISRAELI RAIDS
**France Regrets Failure to Adopt Ceasefire Resolution:**
France’s UN envoy, Nicolas de Riviere, expressed regret over the resolution’s failure to be adopted, given the disastrous situation in Gaza. France voted in favor of the resolution and pledged to persist in efforts toward the release of captives and an immediate ceasefire.
**Algeria Warns of Profound Consequences:**
Algeria’s envoy cautioned that the UNSC’s failure could have far-reaching consequences for the entire Middle East. The call for an immediate ceasefire was stressed, and nations impeding such calls were urged to reconsider their policies to prevent violence and instability in the region.
**Hamas Blames US for Derailing Ceasefire:**
The Palestinian group, Hamas, squarely placed responsibility on the administration of US President Joe Biden, asserting that the decision to block the resolution benefits the Israeli occupation’s agenda to “kill and displace” Palestinians. Hamas deemed the US position a green light for more Israeli aggression.
**Palestinian Authority Criticizes US Veto:**
The office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas condemned the US veto, accusing the administration of providing protection to Israel’s “barbaric attacks” against civilians in Gaza. The US was held accountable for being a partner in what was described as crimes of genocide and ethnic cleansing.
**Qatar Expresses Regret and Pledges Continued Efforts:**
Qatar’s UN Ambassador, Alya Ahmed Saif Al Thani, expressed regret over the UNSC’s failure to adopt the resolution. Despite this setback, Qatar pledged to persist in facilitating efforts to secure a truce in Gaza, highlighting the ongoing commitment to peace.
**Saudi Arabia Calls for Security Council Reform:**
Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry expressed regret at the veto and emphasized the need for Security Council reform. The call was for the Council to fulfill its responsibilities in maintaining peace and security without double standards.
**Cuba Condemns US Complicity in Crimes:**
Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel Bermudez didn’t hold back, blasting the US for being complicit in Israel’s crimes against Palestinians. In a social media post, he stated that the US had once again vetoed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire, making them accomplices to what he referred to as a genocide.
**Amnesty International Criticizes US Choice:**
Agnes Callamard, the director of Amnesty International, expressed disappointment with the US’s decision at the UNSC. She highlighted the missed opportunity to protect Palestinian civilians and criticized the choice to go against international law and universality.
This international backlash underscores the urgency felt by nations and human rights organizations to address the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The repeated US vetoes not only strain diplomatic relations but also raise concerns about the potential consequences for the region and the civilians caught in the crossfire. As the world grapples with finding a resolution, the voices of criticism echo the need for immediate action and a steadfast commitment to peace in this troubled part of the world.